MAROKO133 Breaking ai: Malware Is Now Using AI to Rewrite Its Own Code to Avoid Detection

📌 MAROKO133 Hot ai: Malware Is Now Using AI to Rewrite Its Own Code to Avoid Detec

Researchers at Google’s Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) have discovered that hackers are creating malware that can harness the power of large language models (LLMs) to rewrite itself on the fly.

An experimental malware family dubbed PROMPTFLUX, identified by GTIG in a recent blog post, can rewrite its own code to avoid detection.

It’s an escalation that could make future malware far more difficult to detect, further highlighting growing cybersecurity concerns brought on by the advent and widespread adoption of generative AI.

Tools like PROMPTFLUX “dynamically generate malicious scripts, obfuscate their own code to evade detection, and leverage AI models to create malicious functions on demand, rather than hard-coding them into the malware,” GTIG wrote.

According to the tech giant, this new “just-in-time” approach “represents a significant step toward more autonomous and adaptive malware.”

PROMPTFLUX is a Trojan horse malware that interacts with Google’s Gemini AI model’s application programming interface (API) to learn how to modify itself to avoid detection on the fly.

“Further examination of PROMPTFLUX samples suggests this code family is currently in a development or testing phase since some incomplete features are commented out and a mechanism exists to limit the malware’s Gemini API calls,” the group wrote.

Fortunately, the exploit has yet to be observed infecting machines in the wild, as the “current state of this malware does not demonstrate an ability to compromise a victim network or device,” Google noted. “We have taken action to disable the assets associated with this activity.”

Nonetheless, GTIG noted that malware like PROMPTFLUX appears to be “associated with financially motivated actors.” The team warned of a maturing “underground marketplace for illicit AI tools,” which could lower the “barrier to entry for less sophisticated actors.”

The threat of adversaries leveraging AI tools is very real. According to Google, “State-sponsored actors from North Korea, Iran, and the People’s Republic of China” are already tinkering with the AI to enhance their operations.

In response to the threat, GTIG introduced a new conceptual framework aimed at securing AI systems.

While generative AI can be used to create almost impossible-to-detect malware, it can be used for good as well. For instance, Google recently introduced an AI agent, dubbed Big Sleep, which is designed to use AI to identify security vulnerabilities in software.

In other words, it’s AI being pitted against AI in a cybersecurity war that’s evolving rapidly.

More on AI and cybersecurity: Serious New Hack Discovered Against OpenAI’s New AI Browser

The post Malware Is Now Using AI to Rewrite Its Own Code to Avoid Detection appeared first on Futurism.

🔗 Sumber: futurism.com

📌 MAROKO133 Hot ai: Mercedes EV battery outperforms over 28,000 rivals in real-wor

A new study from Germany’s leading motoring association, ADAC, has revealed that battery performance in plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) varies significantly across brands.

The research, conducted in collaboration with Austrian battery data firm AVILOO, examined over 28,500 state-of-health (SoH) measurements collected over six years.

It compared real-world battery aging across multiple vehicle manufacturers and found that premium automakers like Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Volvo outperformed mainstream brands including Volkswagen, Ford, and Mitsubishi.

The findings indicate that the brand of vehicle is one of the most important factors in predicting how well a PHEV battery will hold up over time. Mercedes-Benz came out on top, showing excellent stability even after extended use, while Mitsubishi ranked lowest in long-term battery health.

Mercedes leads the pack, Mitsubishi trails

ADAC’s data showed that Mercedes-Benz models maintained stable battery performance up to 200,000 kilometers (roughly 120,000 miles), with minimal degradation detected during regular use. The results suggest that high-end engineering and better battery management systems contribute to superior longevity.

In contrast, Mitsubishi’s PHEVs showed noticeable degradation even at relatively low mileages, though this decline tended to level off later in the vehicle’s life.

Volkswagen Group and Volvo models performed reasonably well, maintaining consistent results even with heavy electric-only usage. BMW’s results varied widely across models, depending on how much they were driven in electric mode.

Ford’s PHEVs, however, experienced early drops in battery capacity, which occurred regardless of driving style or usage patterns. ADAC noted that predictions beyond 120,000 miles were not possible for some brands due to limited data samples.

Most PHEVs still perform well over time

Despite the variations between brands, the study concluded that most PHEV batteries retain more than 80 percent of their original capacity after 120,000 miles. That figure aligns with expectations for a typical vehicle lifespan and suggests that hybrid batteries remain reliable for many years of daily use.

As ADAC summarized, this does not mean that vehicles from lower-ranked brands, such as Mitsubishi, are unreliable or unsuitable.

“The ADAC results shouldn’t be interpreted to mean that the Mitsubishi PHEV models aren’t perfectly serviceable, reliable offerings – just that some cars that cost a lot more than the Mitsubishi tend to have batteries that last a little longer under typical driving conditions,” the study noted.

In essence, higher-end vehicles seem to benefit from more advanced battery management and higher-quality components, which translate to better performance and slower degradation.

Choosing the right powertrain for your lifestyle

The study also reinforced that the best vehicle choice depends largely on driving habits. For those who frequently drive short distances on electric power alone, ADAC suggests that a fully battery-electric vehicle (BEV) may be the smarter option. BEVs typically undergo fewer charge cycles compared to PHEVs, which helps preserve battery health over time.

“ADAC also adds that, if frequent electric-only trips are on your agenda, a fully battery-electric vehicle may be the smarter pick, as their batteries go through fewer charging cycles and tend to last longer than PHEV batteries as a consequence,” the report stated.

Ultimately, the findings emphasize that understanding your driving needs and aligning them with the right powertrain can make a major difference in battery longevity. Whether opting for a PHEV or a fully electric vehicle, regular maintenance and thoughtful use will help ensure the battery remains healthy and efficient for years to come.

🔗 Sumber: interestingengineering.com