MAROKO133 Hot crypto: Solana Price Prediction: SOL Twitter Dropped XRP Bomb Hari Ini

📌 MAROKO133 Hot crypto: Solana Price Prediction: SOL Twitter Dropped XRP Bomb Terb

Solana’s official X account posted a single word last night, “XRP,” and the internet promptly lost its mind. Solana itself is currently trading at a $85 price range in a muted price reaction that stands in sharp contrast to the social prediction the post triggered.

The post paired that lone word with a four-second cinematic animation of the Solana logo, no caption, no thread, no explanation. Millions of views followed within hours. The XRP community declared a “flip the switch” moment; Solana’s account fanned the flames with replies including “time to flip the switch” and “we signed 589 NDAs”. The latter a deliberate nod to one of XRP’s most enduring inside jokes.

Against this backdrop of social spectacle, SOL’s underlying technicals tell another story, one worth parsing before drawing any conclusions.

Discover: The best pre-launch token sales

Solana Price Prediction: Break $90 Resistance Now?

SOL has traded in a tight 24-hour range between $84 and $85. The price action is technically compressed. Our short-term model targets $90 as the critical resistance for any near-term recovery, with tomorrow’s range pegged at $84–$86.

SOL holds above its 10- and 20-day EMAs, tentatively constructive, but remains pinned below the 50-, 100-, and 200-day EMAs, all of which are bearish on the daily chart.

If SOL can clear $86 on sustained volume, it could open a path toward $88–$90 resistance. For now, consolidation between $82 and $86 is the most likely scenario, with the contracting triangle on the hourly chart resolving directionally within days.

The XRP tweet generated attention, but not volume. Until SOL clears $86 with conviction, the path of least resistance remains sideways.

Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with

LiquidChain Breaking Social as Solana Tests Key Levels

SOL consolidating below multi-month EMAs is precisely the environment where traders start asking whether large-cap exposure still offers asymmetric upside, or whether that window has already closed at a $48B market cap.

The XRP angle adds narrative heat, but narrative alone doesn’t move price. That asymmetry question is worth taking seriously. For context on where XRP itself fits into the current macro picture, recent XRP price analysis highlights the regulatory tailwinds still in play.

One early-stage project drawing attention in this environment is LiquidChain ($LIQUID), a Layer 3 infrastructure protocol positioning itself as the cross-chain liquidity layer for the BTC, ETH, and SOL ecosystems simultaneously.

The core proposition: a Unified Liquidity Layer that fuses Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana liquidity into a single execution environment, with Deploy-Once Architecture allowing developers to build once and access all three networks.

The presale has raised $675K at a current price of $0.0145, with more than 1600% APY staking bonus. Verifiable features include Single-Step Execution and Verifiable Settlement, infrastructure-layer tooling aimed at the fragmentation problem that has dogged multi-chain development for years.

Research LiquidChain’s presale structure before the next price increase.

The post Solana Price Prediction: SOL Twitter Dropped XRP Bomb appeared first on Cryptonews.

🔗 Sumber: cryptonews.com

📌 MAROKO133 Hot crypto: Crypto Community Pushes Back at Professor Jiang’s Viral CI

A viral clip from the Jack Neel Podcast reignited debate over Bitcoin’s (BTC) origins after Professor Jiang argued that game theory points to the CIA as its most likely creator.

The Beijing-based educator and commentator, whose Predictive History channel has 2.3 million YouTube subscribers, framed Bitcoin as a deep state surveillance tool. The claim drew swift and pointed criticism from across the crypto community.

Did The CIA Create Bitcoin?

In the podcast, Jiang posed three questions. He asked who had the technical capability to build Bitcoin, who benefits from it, and why the creator stayed anonymous.

“When you do game theory analysis, you look at all possibilities, you end up with a deep state, the American deep state. You end up with a CIA,” he said.

Jiang speculated that blockchain may have been developed by the same institutions that developed technologies such as the internet and GPS. Next, he argued that the CIA could benefit from such a framework. 

According to him, blockchain could serve dual purposes: enabling large-scale surveillance and potentially acting as a covert financial mechanism to support off-the-books operations.

Finally, he claimed that secrecy would be essential to maintaining trust in the system. In his view, if users believed blockchain was influenced or controlled by a government agency, it could undermine confidence and deter participation.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Jiang also questioned where blockchain servers are physically located, arguing that whoever controls the hardware controls the software, regardless of open-source claims.

“Because I imagine if you’re able to control the hardware, you can also control the software. I don’t care what they tell me about open source and all that. I want to know where the databases are, where the servers are physically.It’s interesting too that it’s it’s designed like a religion,” he noted.

In addition, he flagged the Winklevoss twins’ large early bet on BTC after their Facebook settlement.

Bitcoin Community Challenge Professor Jiang

Critics called out the server question. An analyst explained that Bitcoin runs on tens of thousands of independently operated nodes globally, with no central server infrastructure and no single point of failure.

“Bitcoin is ultimately an IQ test and this ‘Professor’ has failed. It’s been 17 years and they still fail to understand the basics. It’s okay to say ‘I don’t know’ sometimes, you know,” the analyst added.

Ansel Lindner called it the “opinion of so many midwits.” He argued that such views explain why some gold advocates still struggle to understand Bitcoin and why others gravitate toward centralized, low-quality tokens. 

According to him, the core issue is a fundamental misunderstanding of decentralization.

“People with this view don’t truly understand the open source aspect or the proof of work aspect fully. A strong point about Bitcoin is that it literally doesn’t matter who created it. It can be assessed on its own merits since it’s transparent and decentralized,” Lyn Alden, an investor and author, added.

BeInCrypto previously analyzed Jiang’s claims, concluding that they align more with a conspiracy narrative than a substantiated account of Bitcoin’s origins. To date, no public evidence has linked Bitcoin’s creation to agencies such as DARPA, the Pentagon, or the CIA.

Meanwhile, speculation surrounding Satoshi Nakamoto’s true identity is nothing new. Over the years, numerous theories have emerged pointing to various individuals. 

Most recently, The New York Times pub…

🔗 Sumber: www.beincrypto.com